Objet d’Art

The Harpers Bazaar Australia (Jan 2016) featured Miranda Kerr on the cover.  Nothing earth shattering there surely?  A beautiful professional model and very worthy cover girl.  Except that she was naked, but for a pair of killer Louboutins.  Miranda is shown reclining against the balustrade of a hotel balcony and looks amazing.

For my part, all this image stirred in me was some initial envy, followed by mild self-loathing, culminating in pride in an Aussie girl made good.  I knew that there would be mixed reactions to the image however.

The subsequent issue saw several letters to the editor – I don’t know how many were received on this topic, but two were printed. The first was neutral/positive – this writer had two sons and used the image as a teaching opportunity (the picture is art, what did they see when they look at it etc, celebrating the female form through art).

The second was full of vitriol and launched a scathing attack at the magazine for setting the women’s movement backwards, objectifying women and in general, setting a poor example.

My beautiful husband has long been saying to me that art in ad of itself is neither good nor bad, and that the way one reacts to it merely reflects one’s own personality – eg insecurities (in my case), anger/disappointment/insecurity? (in the first writer) and opportunity (in the second).  He tries especially hard to instil this in me when I have been ‘picked on’ by someone, saying that I am merely the object of an outward expression that person’s personality.  When I wear a certain outfit (my form of artistic expression!) and someone comments on it – be that positively or negatively – it merely reflects that person’s opinion, their personality, perhaps a prior experience of theirs, or other deep seated emotion.

In simpler terms, one can never please everyone, and it’s folly to try!  Rock your look, whatever that may be.

Australian supermodel Miranda Kerr is pictured as she appears on the January/February 2016 edition of 
<i>Harper's Bazaar</i>. Picture: 
<i>Harper's Bazaar</i>

2 thoughts on “Objet d’Art

  1. Lovely writing as always D, you should write more than you do. It’s me D~ and I must say that for the most part, I can agree with your husband. Though on the other hand, I think the effects of advertising on body image mostly has a negative result no matter how positive one may think. Of course, there are many other things that influence our body image: parenting, education, intimate relationships, and so forth, but generally, I think the way beauty is portrayed in the media causes dissatisfaction and negative thoughts about oneself when the results we see on the printed page cannot be achieved by the average person. Perhaps the human race would be better served if we focused more advertising on one’s heart condition and all the good that can can from beautiful acts by beautiful motives. But I suppose in the end, beauty is in the eye of the beholder is it not?

    Kind Thoughts,

    Like

  2. Hi there, lovely to hear from you as always! I do concur, the constant barrage of unrealistic and usually unreal (ie Photoshopped / filtered) images does not augur well for positive self-talk, and we could all do with more good news stories. My beautiful husband was (as always) trying to help me see the motives behind some people’s negative comments, and this lead me to make the above comparisons. If only society in general would become a little more highly evolved and realise that best way to feel good is to raise someone up, rather than putting someone down. Thank you again for taking the time to write (and beautifully too I might add ;)) Regards, D xx

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s